Skip to main content
GO TO CLIENT RESOURCES >>

Investment Fraud Blog

SEC penalties limited in fraud case

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in SEC v. Gabelli, which provided guidance about the time within which the Securities and Exchange Commission may seek civil penalties for stockbroker fraud. Specifically, the case gives the SEC five years to act from the point at which the fraud ends, not the point at which the fraud is discovered.

A recently issued decision in a case involving Samuel and Charles Wyly is one of the first in the country to apply the Court’s decision in Gabelli. Over a period of 13 years, the Wyly brothers are alleged to have run a $550 million fraud and to have engaged in insider trading. District Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled that the SEC could not pursue civil penalties against the brothers for much of the 13 period of the fraud.

Securities arbitration may be subject to limitations period

Readers of this Florida securities fraud blog often learn about lawsuits involving allegations of stockbroker misrepresentations or alleged misconduct amounting to a breach of fiduciary duty. However, arbitration is another resolution process s available to investors who believe they have been wronged by their brokerage firm or financial advisor.

Simply defined, arbitration in many civil law contexts is a process by which adverse parties agree -- in writing -- to a procedure that will culminate in a decision issued by an impartial third party, or arbitrator. The parties often can determine the procedural rules that will govern in that arbitration proceeding, including whether the decision will be binding or non-binding.

Miami brokers implicated in kickback scheme

Miami readers of this blog have heard about several recent instances of misrepresentation or non-disclosure of material information involving particular securities. In some cases, the underlying security was a scam, as in the case of a Ponzi scheme. In other situations, a stockbroker may have been dishonest or negligent in profiling a security to a client. Either way, consumers have a right to know all publicly available information that may impact their purchase of a security, and stockbrokers or brokerage firms have a duty to disclose that information.

However, today’s story adds a twist to the usual allegations of stockbroker misconduct. According to authorities, employees at a Miami brokerage firm entered into a $66 million kickback scheme with an offshore banking official in Venezuela. The official allegedly agreed to share in the proceeds of any new business she directed to the brokers.

SEC accuses Miami officials of municipal bond fraud

In last week’s post, we discussed a number of recent enforcement efforts against municipal governments, brought by officials at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This week, it appears to be the city of South Miami’s turn. SEC officials recently charged the city with securities fraud.

Specifically, SEC officials claim that city leaders failed to disclose to investors issues that might affect the tax-exempt status of two of its municipal bonds. The issue is significant, as investors often base risk assessment and other investment profiling on a security’s tax classification. Tax-exempt bonds typically pay lower interest rates because investors benefit in other ways, such as tax-free interest payments and the ease of mind that comes from owning bonds.

SEC accuses municipal leaders of securities fraud

Miami readers of this blog have learned of many instances of stockbroker misconduct or misrepresentations. In such cases, an investment professional may have breached his or her fiduciary duty by failing to inform potential investors of all the risks associated with various investment options. Today’s posting offers a unique twist on that paradigm. Instead of private sector financial advisors, the alleged wrongdoer is a municipality.

Many American cities raise revenue by selling municipal bonds. Such transactions are subject to applicable securities laws, and will also require disclosure statements to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In fact, the SEC has a separate unit devoted to oversight of such municipal securities activity.

Goldman Sachs Ordered to Pay Investor $2.5 Million

A FINRA arbitration panel has ordered New York-based Goldman Sachs & Co. to pay approximately$2.5 million to an investor who alleged the brokerage firm recommended an unsuitable investment, the Goldman Sachs Special Opportunities Fund. The arbitrators found that the documentation for the Special Opportunities Fund was defective and that Goldman Sachs had failed to supervise the transaction properly. This case is typical of many recent investment fraud cases, where the investment product itself was faulty or flawed, rather than one in which a specific stockbroker personally acted with intent to harm the investor. Such product cases give rise to claims that could be brought by every investor who bought the flawed product.

Hennessey Financial n/k/a Capital Solutions Investment Fraud

Dimond Kaplan & Rothstein, P.A. is investigating sales of the Hennessey Financial Monthly Income Fund, LP n/k/a Capital Solutions (the "Hennessey Fund" or "Capital Solutions"). Capital Solutions was a purported mezzanine real estate lender. Stockbrokers Andrew Rosenberg and Stuart Horowitz sold investments in Capital Solutions to customers through Andrew Stuart Asset Management and the brokerage firm NFP Securities, Inc. in Coral Springs, Florida. We understand that the brokers may have represented to investors that Capital Solutions was a safe investment that paid annual returns of greater than 10%. We further understand that brokers Rosenberg and Horowitz made other misrepresentations to investors about the relative safety of Capital Solutions. In truth, Capital Solutions appears to have been engaging in securities fraud.

Level Global Hedge Fund Co-Founder Sentenced to Prison

Level Global Investors hedge fund co-founder Anthony Chiasson has been sentenced to 6 ½ years in prison for insider trading.The judge presiding over the case commented that he was perplexed that Chiasson would engage in securities fraud, noting Chiasson's wealth and annual compensation that reached as high as $23 million. But given the recent massive frauds committed by Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford, and the insider trading committed by a number of other well-paid, but now convicted hedge fund analysts and traders, it should come as no surprise that greed causes people to act irrationally, stupidly, and illegally.

Warning: Commercial Property Foreclosures May Be On the Horizon

Many small business that own commercial property may face trouble in the coming years. The problem is that banks generally re-evaluate commercial mortgages every five to 10 years. In doing do, banks can choose to renew the loans or ask business owners to pay them off.

With that in mind, after getting burned by billions of dollars in defaulted real estate loans in 2008, 2009, and 2010, lenders are a lot less willing to renew loans that may not be good credit risks. And many businesses appear to be less creditworthy after the 2008 financial crisis, which caused years of lagging revenues as the U.S. economy has taken years to dig itself out of that financial crisis. As a result, many small businesses that own their commercial property may have difficulty finding a lender to renew their loans. Those that cannot find a lender likely will face the loss of their property through foreclosure.

Washington Man Uses JOBS Act to Lure Investors into Fraud Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed charges against a man accused of luring investors into a fraudulent investment scheme by promising big returns under a provision of the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the "JOBS Act"). We believe that investment opportunities brought about by the JOBS Act will lead to an increase in investment fraud.

Subscribe to This Blog's Feed

DO I HAVE A CASE?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Back To Top
  • superlawyers
  • peer review rated
  • receivership for the estate of frederick J. Kunen
  • hubbel